Legal Meets Practical: Accessible Solutions

Passing Through? Better Back it Up…

While it is generally small businesses that have to worry about subcontracting out work, a new rule will make this an issue for every contractor.

Section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) for Fiscal Year 2014 provides additional requirements relative to the review and justification of pass-through contracts. Where an offeror for a contract informs the agency pursuant to FAR 52.215–22 of their intention to award subcontracts for more than 70 percent of the total cost of work to be performed under the contract, the contracting officer must: (1) consider the availability of alternative contract vehicles and the feasibility of contracting directly with a subcontractor or subcontractors that will perform the bulk of the work; (2) make a written determination that the contracting approach selected is in the best interest of the Government; and (3) document the basis for the determination. The proposed rule, FAR 15.404-1(h), is being created in order to implement these statutory requirements.

This rule doesn’t apply to FAR Part 19 acquisitions, or acquisitions under the Small Business Program. The interesting aspect of this is that it effectively deters contractors from teaming together where the prime contractor passes through much of a work to a prime contractor. This is likely done to eliminate the middle man – i.e., the prime contractor – and to therefore also eliminate the markup.

This might benefit the government customer (and the taxpayer), but it also potentially reduces the incentive for contractors to team together. Subcontractors performing the bulk of the work might like this teaming arrangement because they don’t want to  deal with the government customer directly (which involves considerable paperwork and liability). Or perhaps they don’t have the past performance to bid, or they have a good relationship with the prime contractor so they want to collaborate.

What do you think? If you want to comment on the proposed rule, you need to do so by September 9, 2014. Access its publication in the Federal Register here.

Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for Sarah Schauerte’s weekly blog on veteran and small business issues at: https://legalmeetspractical.com.

 

Comments are closed.

Mission Statement

My mission is to provide accessible, high-quality legal services to small business owners and to veterans. I will strive to clearly communicate, understand objectives, and formulate and execute effective legal solutions.

Disclaimer

No Attorney-Client Relationship

This website is maintained exclusively for informational purposes. It is not intended to provide legal or other professional advice and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the lawyer or her clients. Viewing this site, using information from it, or communicating with Sarah Schauerte through this site by email does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Non-Reliance

Online readers should not act nor decline to act, based on content from this site, without first consulting an attorney or other appropriate professional. Because the law changes frequently, this website's content may not indicate the current state of the law. Nothing on this site is meant to predict or guarantee future results. I am not liable for the use or interpretation of information contained on this website, and expressly disclaim all liability for any actions you take or fail to take, based on this website's content.

Links

I do not necessarily endorse and am not responsible for content accessed through this website's links to other Internet resources. Correctness and adequacy of information on those sites is not guaranteed, and unless otherwise stated, I am not associated with such linked sites.

Contacting Me

You may email me through the email address provided by this site, but information you send through email or this website is not secure and may not be confidential. Communications will not be treated as privileged unless I already represent you. Do not send confidential information until you have established a formal attorney-client relationship with me. Even if I represent you, please understand that email security is still uncertain and that you accept all risks of such uncertainty and potential lack of confidentiality when you send us unencrypted, sensitive, or confidential email. Email from me never constitutes an electronic signature, unless it expressly says so.