Legal Meets Practical: Accessible Solutions

It’s Always Cloudy in Philadelphia: Another Scathing VA Audit

On April 15, 2015, after a year of auditing the Philadelphia Regional Office’s disability compensation claims process, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a report confirming more bad news. The over 80-page document, entitled Review of Alleged Data Manipulation and Mismanagement at the VA Regional Office (Philadelphia, PA), paints a dark picture of mismanagement, a lack of accountability, and blatant attempts to cover up unsavory activities.

The Report, which chronicles and details the horrific actions of those within the Philadelphia RO, contains the following findings:

  • Claims for benefits were altered to hide processing delays.
  • Quality reviews were altered inappropriately to remove claims processing errors that had been reported.
  • Long delays in processing appeals of benefits and inquiries about pensions.
  • Failure to stop improper benefits payments of about $2 million.
  • Four bins of unprocessed mail hidden by an employee.
  • Failure to process mail that had been returned as undeliverable, including time-sensitive documents that had the potential to affect veterans’ benefits.

The Philadelphia RO oversees the administration of about $4 billion in annual benefits payments. The review of its operations began in June after allegations were made to the inspector general’s hotline about mismanagement. These weren’t only from veterans – some came from RO staff members, who reported concerns of inappropriate reprisals against staff raising issues. From reviewing the report, it appears that the OIG substantiated almost all of the allegations raised, at least to a degree

The VA’s undersecretary for benefits, Allison Hickey, said in her response to the audit that the new director in Philadelphia is turning things around by building relationships with employees “and focusing on creating a culture that puts veterans and their eligible beneficiaries first.”

She said the agency is hiring more workers to process appeals, reviewing cases to flag improper payments, adding staff to ensure that new mail is processed within six hours, implementing a plan to handle returned mail, and reviewing the pension call center’s standards.

To me, this sounds like putting a Band-Aid on a bullet wound (which is not the first time I’ve used that expression regarding the VA). And unlike some other reports, which discuss only mistreatment or neglect of veterans, it explains how hard it can be to work for the VA. Imagine how demoralizing it would be to truly care about the VA’s mission while being strangled by red tape or while inhabiting a cubicle next to someone who sleeps at their desk all day without recourse. Or for reporting problems and getting in trouble for opening your mouth. It’s downright sad.

For an extremely colorful read on the latest on VA shenanigans, access the Report here.

*Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for Sarah Schauerte’s legal blog on veterans issues at: https://legalmeetspractical.com. Remember to click the link sent to your email to activate your subscription!

2 Responses to “It’s Always Cloudy in Philadelphia: Another Scathing VA Audit”

  1. Thank you for the excellent work Sarah in keeping the Veteran Community informed of the difficulty in reforming such a large bureaucracy. It sounds like Philadelphia still has some serious problems that the band aid will not address.

    One of the things that is very frustrating for the Veteran Community that is aging is the inability of the VA to determine exactly who is eligible for benefits and why and how much. So, they continue paying over 2 million in “improper benefits payments,” meanwhile veterans seeking either raises in their benefit payments or new claims are waiting astronomically long times and then getting denied for very legitimate claims.

  2. The fact that we are talking about it, that it’s no longer being hidden, means that veterans advocates everywhere are FINALLY make a dent in the monolith bueracracy that the VA has become.

Mission Statement

My mission is to provide accessible, high-quality legal services to small business owners and to veterans. I will strive to clearly communicate, understand objectives, and formulate and execute effective legal solutions.

Disclaimer

No Attorney-Client Relationship

This website is maintained exclusively for informational purposes. It is not intended to provide legal or other professional advice and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the lawyer or her clients. Viewing this site, using information from it, or communicating with Sarah Schauerte through this site by email does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Non-Reliance

Online readers should not act nor decline to act, based on content from this site, without first consulting an attorney or other appropriate professional. Because the law changes frequently, this website's content may not indicate the current state of the law. Nothing on this site is meant to predict or guarantee future results. I am not liable for the use or interpretation of information contained on this website, and expressly disclaim all liability for any actions you take or fail to take, based on this website's content.

Links

I do not necessarily endorse and am not responsible for content accessed through this website's links to other Internet resources. Correctness and adequacy of information on those sites is not guaranteed, and unless otherwise stated, I am not associated with such linked sites.

Contacting Me

You may email me through the email address provided by this site, but information you send through email or this website is not secure and may not be confidential. Communications will not be treated as privileged unless I already represent you. Do not send confidential information until you have established a formal attorney-client relationship with me. Even if I represent you, please understand that email security is still uncertain and that you accept all risks of such uncertainty and potential lack of confidentiality when you send us unencrypted, sensitive, or confidential email. Email from me never constitutes an electronic signature, unless it expressly says so.