Legal Meets Practical: Accessible Solutions

House Bill Chop to VA Bonuses is More of a Thin Slice

by Sarah Schauerte

Just a few weeks after American tax dollars funded paid vacations for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employees, the U.S. House of Representatives plans to pass legislation as early as today (October 28th) to chop bonuses for VA employees by at least 14 percent. The VA currently pays out about $400 million in bonuses to its workers each year, and the bill could cap total annual bonus payments at $345 million through fiscal year 2018.

Why? Congress is fed up.

A report on the bill, H.R. 1405,  from the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee noted the growing frustration in Congress with the VA, in particular the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), under which the backlog of veterans’ disability claims has grown.

“[C]oncerns have been raised regarding VA’s provision of merit-based bonuses to managers and supervisors who have led troubled offices, including Veterans Health Administration medical centers with demonstrated incidences of gross negligence in care, and VBA positions where a growing inventory of claims and poor workload management practices abound,” that report said. It added that the VA’s own inspector general has found that bonuses are being given to “employees with less than satisfactory performance and retention incentives being awarded to employees who had stated their intention to retire in the very near future.”
It’s not as though awarding and/or retaining government employees for behavior that would get them fired in a hot second from a private sector position is anything new. Just last week in Montana, county officials were given a written reprimand for enlisting the help of ghost busters and installing a camera to detect paranormal activity at their office location. (Read about that nonsense here). Can you imagine doing that when working for a private business? Don’t let the door hit you on the way out… (If it does, it’s only shutting – that isn’t Slimer on your tail).
But even with the security government jobs afford, people are fed up with the VA. They’re fed up with wait times, with errors, with excuses, and, high on the list, a lack of accountability.  This bill doesn’t pack a hard punch – allowing $345 million instead of $400 million in bonuses is still roughly 86% of the bonus allowed – but still, it’s something.
The bill isn’t limited to a cut in VA bonuses. Among other provisions, H.R. 1405 requires the VA to include an appeals form (a Notice of Disagreement form) when it mails out a notice denying a veteran a specific benefit. It also gives reservists honorary “veteran” status if they serve for more than 20 years, allows veterans to access information about pending benefits claims, and allows the VA to appoint a fiduciary for veterans who are mentally incompetent to manage their finances. The text of the bill may be accessed here.
I admit it. When I heard about the cut in VA bonuses, I got excited. But now that I know it’s more of a thin slice, I’m left wanting more. I want something to happen that prompts VA employees to work to make sure veterans receive their due. Famous psychologist B.F. Skinner had it right – reward the good, punish the bad.
Did you find this article informative? If so, pass it along or sign up for my weekly blog on veterans issues at https://legalmeetspractical.com. Please remember to click the link sent to your email address to activate your subscription!

 

 

Comments are closed.

Mission Statement

My mission is to provide accessible, high-quality legal services to small business owners and to veterans. I will strive to clearly communicate, understand objectives, and formulate and execute effective legal solutions.

Disclaimer

No Attorney-Client Relationship

This website is maintained exclusively for informational purposes. It is not intended to provide legal or other professional advice and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the lawyer or her clients. Viewing this site, using information from it, or communicating with Sarah Schauerte through this site by email does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Non-Reliance

Online readers should not act nor decline to act, based on content from this site, without first consulting an attorney or other appropriate professional. Because the law changes frequently, this website's content may not indicate the current state of the law. Nothing on this site is meant to predict or guarantee future results. I am not liable for the use or interpretation of information contained on this website, and expressly disclaim all liability for any actions you take or fail to take, based on this website's content.

Links

I do not necessarily endorse and am not responsible for content accessed through this website's links to other Internet resources. Correctness and adequacy of information on those sites is not guaranteed, and unless otherwise stated, I am not associated with such linked sites.

Contacting Me

You may email me through the email address provided by this site, but information you send through email or this website is not secure and may not be confidential. Communications will not be treated as privileged unless I already represent you. Do not send confidential information until you have established a formal attorney-client relationship with me. Even if I represent you, please understand that email security is still uncertain and that you accept all risks of such uncertainty and potential lack of confidentiality when you send us unencrypted, sensitive, or confidential email. Email from me never constitutes an electronic signature, unless it expressly says so.