Legal Meets Practical: Accessible Solutions

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Deployment: What About the Dog?

by Sarah Schauerte

Upon review of my blog posts over the last few months or so, I realized they focus almost solely on government shenanigans – the shutdown, various forms of red tape, inefficiencies, and frustrations. Sure, veterans need to know about these timely issues, but it is not my aim to depress my readers. Accordingly, this blog post is about….puppies!

Well, dogs and cats. Also, it does relate to military members: what can soldiers do with their pets when they’re deployed?

Last Saturday, when I was at the dog park with my Lab/Pitbull/Greyhound/Unidentified Mutt, Archer, I started talking with two other dog owners, Christopher and Sandy. Christopher is on active duty with the Marines, and he just returned from a six-month deployment in Afghanistan. Sandy is a retired nurse, and her husband served as a Marine for three tours in Vietnam. They knew each other through a program called Guardian Angels for Soldiers’ Pets, which is an organization designed to help deploying military members find someone to watch their pets while they’re gone.

It’s a brilliant idea, because here’s the thing. If a soldier asks a family member to watch his pet while he’s away, of course the family member isn’t going to turn him down. But at the same time, it might not be a good match. Maybe the family member only says yes out of obligation, or maybe the family member is elderly but the pet needs tons of exercise. Maybe the family member’s pets don’t get along with other animals. Or the family member is gone during long work hours, but they try to make it work.

With an organization like this one, however, a military member gets a good match. The organization works to find a “foster” – essentially a long-term babysitter for the pet while the soldier is away. That foster is someone who is military-friendly – another soldier who used the program who is paying the favor forward, a veteran or veteran family, or maybe just a veterans advocate. Plus, they’ve volunteered – that person wants the dog in their home.

While some people may be understandably leery about leaving their baby (yes, a pet is actually a child) with a stranger, that person has been screened through the foster program. The soldier can meet with the foster to make sure they’re comfortable with the arrangement, and the soldier can also have friends and family members check up on the foster to make sure the pet’s happy.

Also, a soldier gets a friend for life. Someone who watches your pet while you are deployed for six months or more will become your friend. Period.

If you know anyone who has a pet and may be deployed, foster organizations such as Guardian Angels should be considered. After all, your pet is your baby. You want to be sure he or she has the absolute best babysitter while you’re gone, and that you have peace of mind.

Don’t, however, be surprised if you come back to find your dog a bit on the porky side. Because if I choose to participate in this program (and I may), I will be overfeeding your pet. It may also be used to scraps and sleeping in a people bed. I apologize in advance for any inconvenience.

For more information about foster programs, or to donate to their amazing cause, visit the following websites: Guardian Angels for Soldiers’ Pets, Dogs on Deployment, and NetPets. Keep in mind that you should do this well before you deploy, as the application process and being matched with the right foster might take some time.

Did you find this article informative? If so, please pass it on to a deploying military member. Also, sign up for my weekly blog addressing veterans issues at: https://legalmeetspractical.com.

A Scary Story for Halloween: VetBiz Purgatory

by Sarah Schauerte

I absolutely adore Halloween, so I thought it was worth writing a post on a topic that is very scary to veteran business owners….the VetBiz verification process!

As a certified VetBiz Counselor, I hear a lot of complaints about the Center for Verification and Evaluation’s (“CVE,” formerly the “Center for Veterans Enterprise”) VetBiz application process. Public sentiment has gotten to the point that this summer, a House bill was introduced in Congress to take the verification process from the VA and give it to the Small Business Administration.

Perhaps in part prompted by the hostile feedback, the CVE instituted two different programs to give veteran business owners a second shot in getting verified. Rather than getting denied and having to go through the request for reconsideration process (terrible!), it developed two alternative processes. One of these is VetBiz pre-determination. This is when the only thing wrong with an application rests in “easily correctable errors” to the business’ corporate document(s), and the CVE gives the business five days to fix the document(s) and resubmit. Basically, it’s when your only issue is a drafting problem. (And think about it. How often does a business use its bylaws/operating agreement, anyway?)

This process is great if it goes right. If it doesn’t, however – well, here is one veteran company’s* story….

In mid-September, a mother-and-daughter company (we’ll call them “Company Eligible”), receive a pre-determination letter. Their application looks good, but the CVE found a few problems with their operating agreement.

Do they want to participate in the VetBiz pre-determination process? Of course they do! Company Eligible quickly fixes the issues with their operating agreement and resubmits, holding their breath. Two of the commercial vendors they do business with require VetBiz verification, and they know that if they get denied or don’t get their verification quickly, they’ll lose work.

They don’t have to wait long. Almost immediately, they receive a letter back from CVE. “Sorry,” it says in essence, “you forgot to sign and re-date your document. You’re going to have to withdraw your application.” (Note – The CVE’s “Required Documents List” does not say the operating agreement needs to be signed and dated).

“Wait!” the owners say frantically, tearing out their hair, “we’ll sign! Right now! How do you want us to get it to you? Fax? Scanned? Hand delivery? Carrier pigeon? How?”

“Nope,” says CVE. “You gotta resubmit.”

At this point in time, Company Eligible contacts me. I email and call the CVE several times over the next several days, explaining the situation with the contracts. I provide contact information for the prime contractors. Ultimately, the only answer I receive is, “we don’t expedite applications, but since their application was already reviewed, it shouldn’t take too long.”

CVE then requests information it hadn’t the first time around. Company Eligible provides it. The company owners tear out more hair. This is late September.

Weeks go by. The owners are running out of hair to pull out. They’ve lost one of their two contracts. I engage the CVE again, and via the hotline I am told it is taking this long in order to “protect the integrity of the process.” (Note – the stated sole mission of the CVE is to assist veterans with starting and building their businesses). I ask why it is necessary to re-evaluate an application that had already been evaluated a month ago and found sufficient save for a few drafting errors. The CVE employee doesn’t have an answer. Meanwhile, the company owners run out of hair to pull out.

Finally, today, on this All Hallow’s Eve, Company Eligible was released from VetBiz purgatory by receiving their VetBiz verification, almost a month and a half after CVE had determined that the only issues with their application were minor drafting problems.

Luckily it is Halloween, so the owners can place wigs over their bald heads and everyone will think it is part of a costume. Company Eligible has lost business because of the delay in processing their VetBiz application, but at least they have the verification, and they are still in the game for one of the contracts.

This is a scary story because it can happen to anyone who goes through the VetBiz pre-determination process. If the business fixes its issues right away and CVE approves them, it’s great. But if not, the business is forced to withdraw and is back in the application pool.

More alarming, however, is this fate makes no sense. If CVE is re-evaluating all of those applications deemed eligible for the predetermination process, that’s double work. Both for the sake of efficiency, and to promote its stated mission of helping veteran-owned small businesses, you would think the CVE would want to work with those businesses flagged for VetBiz pre-determination to push them to verification as soon as possible. But the CVE has the power to do things that don’t make sense, and that’s the scariest thing of all.

Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for my weekly legal blog on veterans issues at: https://legalmeetspractical.com. Remember to click the link sent to your email to activate your subscription!

*Blog written at company’s request

House Bill Chop to VA Bonuses is More of a Thin Slice

by Sarah Schauerte

Just a few weeks after American tax dollars funded paid vacations for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employees, the U.S. House of Representatives plans to pass legislation as early as today (October 28th) to chop bonuses for VA employees by at least 14 percent. The VA currently pays out about $400 million in bonuses to its workers each year, and the bill could cap total annual bonus payments at $345 million through fiscal year 2018.

Why? Congress is fed up.

A report on the bill, H.R. 1405,  from the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee noted the growing frustration in Congress with the VA, in particular the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), under which the backlog of veterans’ disability claims has grown.

“[C]oncerns have been raised regarding VA’s provision of merit-based bonuses to managers and supervisors who have led troubled offices, including Veterans Health Administration medical centers with demonstrated incidences of gross negligence in care, and VBA positions where a growing inventory of claims and poor workload management practices abound,” that report said. It added that the VA’s own inspector general has found that bonuses are being given to “employees with less than satisfactory performance and retention incentives being awarded to employees who had stated their intention to retire in the very near future.”
It’s not as though awarding and/or retaining government employees for behavior that would get them fired in a hot second from a private sector position is anything new. Just last week in Montana, county officials were given a written reprimand for enlisting the help of ghost busters and installing a camera to detect paranormal activity at their office location. (Read about that nonsense here). Can you imagine doing that when working for a private business? Don’t let the door hit you on the way out… (If it does, it’s only shutting – that isn’t Slimer on your tail).
But even with the security government jobs afford, people are fed up with the VA. They’re fed up with wait times, with errors, with excuses, and, high on the list, a lack of accountability.  This bill doesn’t pack a hard punch – allowing $345 million instead of $400 million in bonuses is still roughly 86% of the bonus allowed – but still, it’s something.
The bill isn’t limited to a cut in VA bonuses. Among other provisions, H.R. 1405 requires the VA to include an appeals form (a Notice of Disagreement form) when it mails out a notice denying a veteran a specific benefit. It also gives reservists honorary “veteran” status if they serve for more than 20 years, allows veterans to access information about pending benefits claims, and allows the VA to appoint a fiduciary for veterans who are mentally incompetent to manage their finances. The text of the bill may be accessed here.
I admit it. When I heard about the cut in VA bonuses, I got excited. But now that I know it’s more of a thin slice, I’m left wanting more. I want something to happen that prompts VA employees to work to make sure veterans receive their due. Famous psychologist B.F. Skinner had it right – reward the good, punish the bad.
Did you find this article informative? If so, pass it along or sign up for my weekly blog on veterans issues at https://legalmeetspractical.com. Please remember to click the link sent to your email address to activate your subscription!

 

 

Stating the Obvious: All VA Benefits Need Advance Funding

Okay, the shutdown’s over. Government officials are back to work, and VA benefits such as disability compensation and GI bill applications will continue to be processed. Crisis averted.

Well, kind of. During the shutdown, the appeals offices at all Regional Offices were shut down. So were the records departments. The progress made in creating a dent in the VA backlog also slipped considerably.

And did Congress really have to put our veterans and their families through the stress of not knowing whether they would receive their benefits in November?

When the government shutdown began at midnight on September 30, VA healthcare and medical facilities were protected because they already had their 2014 budget approved last year. But that was not the case for discretionary accounts, which include money for disability claims to veterans, their dependents or survivors, as well as money for veterans attending school on the GI Bill. Veterans waited with bated breath to see what the future held in store for these benefits, generally paid on the first of the month. October was covered, but November was up in the air. Payment of November benefits hinged on the ability of Congress to strike a deal before the end of October.

Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs)  say whether these benefits should be paid should not be a question. Like VA healthcare, other veterans benefits should be funded in advance. In a statement released on October 17th, the Veterans of Foreign Wars said it appreciates that Congress passed compromise legislation that reopened the government after two weeks, but the organization noted that the measure is short-term with no guarantee there will not be another shutdown.

VSOs and other veteran advocates are all backing identical House and Senate bills called the  “Putting Veterans Funding First Act,” which would require Congress to pass a full year’s appropriations bill for all VA discretionary programs one year in advance. This means that in the event of a government shutdown, essential VA benefits are not affected. Rather than sending VA employees home on a paid vacation, their departments’ operations would continue functioning as normal.

This isn’t rocket science. This isn’t even good government. This is decent government. These are our veterans we’re dealing with here, the individuals who fought to protect the rights of a nation that is denying theirs. Treat our veterans with respect by protecting the benefits they’re entitled to.

Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for my weekly blog on veterans issues at: https://legalmeetspractical.com. Please remember to click the link sent to your email address to activate your subscription!

Access my previous blogs relating to the government shutdown here (10/1/2013) and here (10/10/2013).

 

VetBiz, the Busted Tire: Are Recent Developments Just a Patch?

by Sarah Schauerte

Whether in reaction to a bill introduced in the House that threatened to take it away, or because of some other motivation, the VA has lately initiated a slew of changes to its VetBiz Verification Program. But is this the equivalent of changing a leaky tire, or sticking on a cheap patch?

As we know, the Center for Verification and Evaluation (CVE), which is part of the VA, is responsible for verifying Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses or Veteran-Owned Small Businesses as eligible for the VA’s Veterans First Contracting  Program. (“CVE” used to stand for “Center for Veterans Enterprise,” but this was changed via an interim final rule published in the Federal Register on September 30). For quite a while, CVE has been heatedly criticized for issues arising with the VetBiz Program. Common criticisms include delays and errors in application processing, poor communication, and a lack of clarity regarding what is required for successful verification.

In August, a bill was introduced in Congress to take the Veterans First Contracting Program from the VA and put it in the hands of the Small Business Administration. (Read about this bill here). Around the same time that this occurred, changes began occurring with VetBiz. At that time, the VA had already implemented its VetBiz Pre-Determination process, which allowed veteran business owners to quickly fix drafting errors in their corporate documents and resubmit their applications (rather than receive a denial). Also, the VetBiz website had been revamped to include additional resources.

After the bill was introduced, the VetBiz website was mum on the subject. Would the VA fight to keep authority over VetBiz, or improve the process under its auspices?

The CVE did not address this on its website. It did, however, post new statistics on wait times and approval rates. Anyone glimpsing them gasped in surprise. 96% approval? How is this possible? This seems too good to be true!

This is possible because of the new Pre-Decision process, which does, in fact, result in a statistic too good to be true.

In the VetBiz Pre-Decision process, an applicant that would otherwise be denied gets to withdraw its application.  Since there is no incentive to accepting a denial, the decision is a no-brainer.  And guess what happens when an application is withdrawn? The denial is not included in the CVE’s statistics.

The VetBiz statistics also state that initial applications and requests for reconsideration are taking a much shorter time to process. When I say “much shorter,” I mean that waiting times are cut in half, which is a drastic change.

Here’s the wrinkle. Now with the new processes – Pre-determination and Pre-decision – veterans are withdrawing their applications instead of being denied. When the CVE says it takes a certain number of days to receive a decision, how many times has the veteran withdrawn, and then resubmitted? What number would we have if the CVE counted the time a veteran first submitted his application, to when it was finally approved?

Then there’s the website. Many resources have been added, which is great. However, it is difficult to navigate to find these resources, which is not so great. I know what I’m searching for when I research on the VetBiz website, and I have trouble finding it. A veteran business owner who is trying to familiarize himself with the process would have even greater trouble.

I’m not trying to get down on the CVE here. I am genuinely glad for the new developments, and the effort expended on its behalf. There are improvements, and that should be recognized. However, as it relates to the claims that verification comes much quicker, and much easier – context to these statistics should be provided. If a veteran-owned business is verified in 20 days, but it took two withdrawals for that to happen, that 20 day wait period shouldn’t be factored into the statistics to give the impression that verification is lightning-fast.

The CVE’s recent efforts aren’t a complete change of a busted tire, which is what the CVE frames them to be. At the same time, they’re not just a patch, either, and the CVE deserves credit for its willingness to get its hands dirty.

Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for my weekly blog on veterans issues at: https://legalmeetspractical.com. Please remember to click the link sent to your email to activate your subscription!

 

“Non-Essential” But Essential to Vets: Further Effects of the Government Shutdown

We’re about to close out the second week of the government shutdown, and the mood is grim.

Because the government does not have legal authority to spend money on services not deemed “essential” during a shutdown, only key government functions are currently operating. These include anything related to national security, public safety, or programs written into permanent law (like Social Security).

While programs affecting veterans are more protected than many others, veterans are still feeling the effects of this shutdown. The following is a brief summary of the current impact on veterans:

VA healthcare is largely unaffected.

VA health care is protected. In 2009, Congress passed a law to fund the VA one year in advance. This allows the VA health care to plan ahead and ensures that VA health care is funded for an additional year beyond the government shutdown. All VA medical appointment and prescription drug phone lines will be active during the shutdown. This includes emergency lines, such as the suicide hotline.

VA disability, pension, or GI Bill Benefits for October are protected.

All payments for the month of October are already out. VA benefits are protected and should go out during a shutdown. However, the VA recently announced that if the shutdown lasts longer than 2-3 weeks, the VA might not have enough cash on hand to pay benefits in November.

Benefits may not be paid in November.

The VA has not given any specifics on what will happen if the shutdown continues for the next few weeks, and they run out of cash on hand. However, given recent developments, it appears likely the shutdown will be lifted by then.

New VA disability claims will experience delay. 

If you filed a claim before the shutdown, the VA will continue to process it, but expect there to be some delay. While the VA employees that are working on your claim are protected from the government shutdown, they are affected by the fact that related departments and resources are no longer functioning (such as appeals and records departments). Please still file a claim if you were planning to do so, however – this will preserve your effective date.

 New Post 9/11 Bill claims for next semester will experience backlog. 

New Post 9/11 GI Bill claims for next semester will also likely be delayed if the shutdown goes longer than a few weeks since they will not be processing new claims during a shutdown. The VA’s education hotline is unavailable off during a shutdown as well.

VA disability claim appeals are not being processed.

All work on appeals will be halted during the government shutdown. These departments in Regional Offices have been closed and the workers furloughed.

Active members of the military will still be paid.

Mid-week the president signed a bill passed by both the House and the Senate that would ensure that the military continues to get paid in the event of a government shutdown.

Some military base services are affected.

Military hospitals and clinics should remain open. However, expect many MWR (Morale, Welfare, and Recreation) and community services (like commissaries) to be either closed or limiting operations. Your chain of command will have detailed information about what is happening on your local base.

 Many are offended by the idea that they are on furlough because their positions were deemed “non essential,” or that their quality of life is affected because a service they depend on is “non essential.” 

As someone who lives and works in D.C., the discontent and anger is palpable. (For example, having veterans be denied access to the monuments that honor them is beyond ridiculous and insulting). And I have to wonder – how does this look to other nations? We’re the U.S. This is embarrassing, and our nation’s leaders are capable of taking better care of us. But when will they show it?

Here’s to hoping that my next blog post will summarize the deal struck by Congress and the end to the government shutdown.

Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for my weekly blog on veterans issues at: https://legalmeetspractical.com. Please remember to click the link sent to your email to activate your subscription!

Breaking News: How the Government Shutdown Will Affect Veterans

It’s the end of the day on Monday, September 30th, so I’m posting this. I wish I wasn’t.

The inability of Congress to pass a funding bill means a partial government shutdown for the first time in 17 years, leaving some government services suspended and hundreds of thousands of workers furloughed. I know many individuals who are personally affected.

While the most essential government services will continue uninterrupted, the lack of funding will be a minor headache for some Americans, and a serious concern for others.

So what about our veterans? How does the government shutdown affect their benefits? Their healthcare, their resources?

Today, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) issued guidance on how veterans are affected by a potential lapse in appropriations. As I predicted in a blog last week, VA call centers and hotlines will cease to function, and the VA will no longer continue overtime processing of backlogged initial disability compensation claims.  The full list of areas affected is as follows:

  • VBA Regional Offices public contact services will not be available.
  • No decisions on claims appeals or motions will be issued by the Board of Veterans Appeals.
  • Freedom of Information Act queries will not be processed.
  • Privacy Act requests will not be processed.
  • The VA’s homepage (www.va.gov) will be updated intermittently, as well as the VA’s main and hospital social media websites (such as Facebook and Twitter).
  • The VBA will not be able to continue overtime for claims processors, which will affect the backlog.
  • Claims processing and payments in the compensation, pension, education, and vocational rehabilitation programs are anticipated to continue through late October. However, in the event of a prolonged shutdown, claims processing and payments in these programs will be suspended when available funding is exhausted.
  • The recruiting and hiring of Veteran job applicants will cease with the exception of the Veterans Health Administration.
  • Presidential Memorial certificates will not be processed.
  • Internments at National Cemeteries will not be processed, and cemeteries will be conducted on a reduced schedule.
  • Overseas military coordinator operations will be suspended.
  • VA Secretary correspondence with veterans and veterans service organizations will be suspended.

When I receive more information, I will update accordingly relating to how the government shutdown will affect veterans. To stay informed, please sign up for my blog at: https://legalmeetspractical.com. You can also access the veteran’s field guide to government shutdown at: http://www.va.gov/opa/docs/Field_Guide_20130927.pdf. The latter document contains a link to the VA’s contingency plan, which will be updated in the event of a prolonged government shutdown.

Stay tuned, and please – comments on this important subject are welcome. 

Tick, Tock: What Government Shutdown Means for Vets

As has been heavily covered by the media lately, if Congress can’t find a deal by this Monday, the government will shut down. This will leave just enough resources to cover the essential services of the government.

So what does this mean for veterans? What about veteran healthcare? What about pension or compensation benefits or GI Bill checks?

The good news is VA healthcare is protected. In 2011, the veterans’ community banded together to convince Congress to fund the VA one year in advance. This means that VA healthcare will be funded for an additional year beyond the government shut down. A bill is also pending before Congress that would fully fund the VA’s discretionary budget a year ahead of schedule. (Access information about the bill, HR 813, here).

Beyond VA healthcare, it is unclear how veterans will be affected by government shutdown. Based on past experience, it appears that VA compensation and pension benefits will be unaffected. However, as there has been no government shutdown since the Post-911 GI Bill was passed, it is unclear how these benefits will be impacted by a government shutdown. (Access information about the post-911 GI Bill here).

One area that will likely be affected is VA disability compensation claims processing. Since March, the VA backlog (which includes only initial claims), has decreased by nearly 30% because of priority placed on these claims and overtime. If the government shuts down, the VA will lose administrative support, and claims processing may be slowed or may even shut down. It is also unlikely whether mandatory overtime – a key component of the VA’s major process in eliminating the backlog – will continue. It is also possible that VA hotlines and customer service desks will close.

Hopefully, Congress will act to make sure the impact on veterans is as minimal as possible. As for me, I’m hoping Congress finds a solution before the end of the weekend. But if it doesn’t, at least we have an idea of what to expect.

[As a note, the best article I found on this issue was published in The Washington Post, which covers how every government shutdown has ended. (This article may be accessed here)].

Thanks for reading! If you found this article informative, please sign up for my blog at https://legalmeetspractical.com or pass this article on to a friend.

 

 

 

Jump Through That Tiny Hoop! The VetBiz Resume

No one likes writing their resume, and this situation isn’t any different. But does it really have to be this difficult?

As many veteran small business owners know, in order to participate in the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Veterans First Contracting Program, a business must be listed in the VA’s VetBiz Vendor Information Pages (VetBiz). VetBiz is administered by the Center for Veterans Enterprise (CVE).

When applying to be listed in VetBiz, one of the necessary documents a business must submit is a resume. The CVE asks for the resume of all owners, directors, partners, officers, and key personnel. The CVE’s rationale for requiring resumes is these will allow the Examination team to determine each individual’s position within the applicant company, their jobs and responsibilities, as well as address experience and possible outside employment.

As a certified CVE counselor, there are a number of red flags I look for in a resume:

  • Does a resume show that someone other than the veteran is the President (or highest officer)? 
  • Does a resume list outside employment that might prohibit the veteran from showing he works for the business on a full-time basis?
  • Does a resume demonstrate that someone other than the veteran holds a license necessary for the business to operate?
  • Does a resume reflect a lack of management experience possessed by the veteran?

These are all elements the CVE considers when determining whether the veteran “controls” the business applicant, which is an eligibility requirement for listing in VetBiz. In order to show that a veteran controls the business, it must be demonstrated that the veteran is responsible for the day-to-day and long-term management of the company, that he works full-time during normal business hours, and that he possesses the requisite management experience. Failure to show any of these is grounds for denial.

I completely agree that the CVE should do what is necessary to make sure that a veteran is truly in charge of a business seeking verification on VetBiz. Towards that end, a resume can be a necessary component in making that determination.

At the same time, the resume requirement can be an unnecessary thorn in veteran owners’ sides. The CVE specifically requires resumes to contain the following information: education and training received; former employers; dates of employment; position titles and responsibilities; and present employer, date of hire and position title and responsibilities. This is very precise information, and if a veteran does not submit a resume that conforms to these parameters, he will receive a notice from CVE that additional information/documentation (ie, a revised resume) is necessary in order to process his application. This is frustrating, especially for the veteran business owner who has been running his own shop for decades. Should he really be required to draft an entirely new resume to fit these requirements?

The CVE has good intentions here, and I understand the general need for a resume. However, in some instances, veterans should be afforded some slack. As long as a resume enables the CVE to determine whether a veteran is truly managing the applicant business and has the experience to do so, it shouldn’t be concerned with whether he listed his position title for a job he held five years ago in an unrelated field (and yes, the CVE will ask the veteran to revise and re-submit his resume if he forgets to include that!).

Also, if a veteran operates a solo proprietorship or single-member LLC or corporation, and has done so for a number of years, he should be permitted to submit a Letter of Explanation in a resume’s place. Don’t make the Vietnam veteran who has successfully run his business for thirty years jump through that hoop. He’ll get stuck, and you want him in the VetBiz program. After all, isn’t the point of the program to have as many eligible businesses listed as possible?

Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for my weekly blog at: https://legalmeetspractical.com. Also, the homepage for the CVE and the VetBiz program may be accessed at: http://vetbiz.gov.

In the Modern Technological Age, VA is Old Atari

When will VA records all be electronic? I’ll give you a hint. See that pig over there? How are its flying lessons coming?

The developments aren’t highly publicized, but the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department of Defense(DOD) have spent the last half a decade trying to convert their paper files to electronic files. Combined, the departments spent at least $1.3 billion during the last four years trying unsuccessfully to develop a single electronic health records system between the two departments. The result? Veterans’ disability claims are piling up in paper files.

For a veteran in the disability claims process, these records are critical. They include DOD service and health records needed by the VA to decide veterans’ disability ratings and the compensation they will receive for their injuries.

The National Defense Authorization Act for 2008 mandated that the DOD and VA secretaries “develop and implement electronic health-record systems or capabilities that allow for full interoperability of personal health information between the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs.” However, after several years and several failed plans, neither the DOD nor the VA is able to completely access the other’s electronic records. Meanwhile, each has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on upgrades to its information technology and on attempts to improve interoperability between their systems.

In 2011, the agencies decided the solution would be to create a single electronic healthcare record together. But after two years, the departments’ secretaries in February of this year canceled the plan with little public explanation. They then announced they would upgrade their own electronic healthcare records systems and build software that would allow the two systems to exchange files.

The VA has also invested $12 billion over five years in a project called Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology, or T4, to upgrade its own technologies. One of the major goals of this initiative is for the upgrade to include interoperable software that can be used between the VA and the DOD.

Interestingly, the VA seemed to be investing in this plan well before the joint deal with the DOD fell through. The VA signed a $80.3 multi-year contract with a company called Harris Corp almost a year before it gave up on devising a single electronic health record system with the DOD.

Converting all of these paper files to electronic files is no easy task. No one disputes that. But at the same time, surely there is a more efficient and cost-effective way. The VA’s current scanning system – the Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS) – cost $480 million between 2009 and 2012, yet the VA never set deadlines for the records to be scanned. The result is that as of mid-summer of this year, only thirty percent of paper claims had been scanned.

And it’s important these documents are scanned in, and properly. It is much, much easier to lose a paper file than an electronic one. And remember the great fire of 1973? This was when a fire at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis (fun trivia fact – my dad works there) destroyed 16 to 18 million military personnel fires. Also, electronic files can be more easily accessed and transmitted.

The VA has announced the goal of all VA files to be processed within 125 days. But in order to meet this goal, these paper files must be scanned into the system. Some Regional Offices such as Roanoke are ahead of the curve, but for the most part, Regional Offices lag far behind. And as a consequence, the veterans suffer.

This is an electronic age. The VA needs to get up to speed, or our nation’s veterans will pay the price.

Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for my weekly blog at: https://legalmeetspractical.com. 

 

 

 

Page 18 of 24« First...10«1617181920»...Last »

Mission Statement

My mission is to provide accessible, high-quality legal services to small business owners and to veterans. I will strive to clearly communicate, understand objectives, and formulate and execute effective legal solutions.

Disclaimer

No Attorney-Client Relationship

This website is maintained exclusively for informational purposes. It is not intended to provide legal or other professional advice and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the lawyer or her clients. Viewing this site, using information from it, or communicating with Sarah Schauerte through this site by email does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Non-Reliance

Online readers should not act nor decline to act, based on content from this site, without first consulting an attorney or other appropriate professional. Because the law changes frequently, this website's content may not indicate the current state of the law. Nothing on this site is meant to predict or guarantee future results. I am not liable for the use or interpretation of information contained on this website, and expressly disclaim all liability for any actions you take or fail to take, based on this website's content.

Links

I do not necessarily endorse and am not responsible for content accessed through this website's links to other Internet resources. Correctness and adequacy of information on those sites is not guaranteed, and unless otherwise stated, I am not associated with such linked sites.

Contacting Me

You may email me through the email address provided by this site, but information you send through email or this website is not secure and may not be confidential. Communications will not be treated as privileged unless I already represent you. Do not send confidential information until you have established a formal attorney-client relationship with me. Even if I represent you, please understand that email security is still uncertain and that you accept all risks of such uncertainty and potential lack of confidentiality when you send us unencrypted, sensitive, or confidential email. Email from me never constitutes an electronic signature, unless it expressly says so.