Legal Meets Practical: Accessible Solutions

Starbucks Faux Pas Over Service Dog Angers Vets Everywhere

by Sarah Schauerte

A checklist to get sued:

1) Don’t train your employees about the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

2) When you violate the ADA, make sure it’s by barring entry to your business to a veteran with an obvious disability.

3) Make sure the service dog you’re banning is an adorable yellow Labrador.

4) Do it in Texas, an extremely veteran-friendly state.

Check, check, check and check! Although Starbucks hasn’t gotten sued…yet. It has merely gotten some really, really bad press.

According to the different accounts of a story that was posted around the country earlier last week, Mr. Yancy Baer, a veteran of the Iraq war, tried to pop into a Starbucks on Memorial Drive in San Antonio. Mr. Baer had the lower half of his left leg amputated due to bone cancer, and he uses a yellow Labrador, Verbena, as his service dog. A Starbucks employee stopped him, and told him he couldn’t bring his dog into the store.

Mr. Baer is missing part of his left leg. I’d like to stress that again.

Embarrassed by the confrontation, which was in front of a store full of customers, Mr. Baer started shaking. He tried to explain to the sassy barista that Verbena is his service dog. When pressed, he described what Verbena does to assist him.

The response?

“Why can’t you do that for yourself?”

Adding to the terrible nature of this story is the reason Mr. Baer was in San Antonio – to give a speech on behalf of the service dog organization where he obtained Verbena – Canine Companions for Independence, a California-based non-profit organization that is the largest provider of assistance dogs in the United States.

In the end, another employee intervened and helped Mr. Baer, but I doubt he was able to enjoy his coffee. I’m willing to bet he took it to go, just to get the heck away from that barista.

The story didn’t end there for Starbucks. Somehow, it was repeated and picked up by the local television station, and then national channels. I personally found the story on a LinkedIn forum (U.S. Military Veterans Network). San Antonio is a very pro-veteran area, and I wouldn’t be surprised if there weren’t picketers outside that particular store. (News stories helpfully shared that it is a Starbucks on Memorial Drive).

Last summer, I blogged about a man who was denied entry to the Texas state legislature with his service dog, Piggy, a pug used to help him with his post-traumatic stress disorder. In that article, I discussed how important it is for businesses to know that when it comes to service dogs, under the ADA a private business is only allowed to ask two questions: 1) Is the animal required because of a disability? and 2) What work or task has the animal been trained to perform? An employee of a private business may not ask about the nature or extent of an individual’s disabilities, and he may not ask for documentation proving that the animal is in fact a service dog. If an employee crosses this line, the business risks a lawsuit.

In this instance, while Mr. Baer has publicly stated that he has “no hard feelings” towards Starbucks, the fact of the matter is that he had to have spoken up to someone, or the story never would have gotten press. And that press has surely led to a lot of customers boycotting that particular Starbucks. All because of one employee’s nasty faux pas.

Well, folks. One faux pas can cost you.

Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for my weekly blog on veterans issues at: https://legalmeetspractical.com.

 

Comments are closed.

Mission Statement

My mission is to provide accessible, high-quality legal services to small business owners and to veterans. I will strive to clearly communicate, understand objectives, and formulate and execute effective legal solutions.

Disclaimer

No Attorney-Client Relationship

This website is maintained exclusively for informational purposes. It is not intended to provide legal or other professional advice and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the lawyer or her clients. Viewing this site, using information from it, or communicating with Sarah Schauerte through this site by email does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Non-Reliance

Online readers should not act nor decline to act, based on content from this site, without first consulting an attorney or other appropriate professional. Because the law changes frequently, this website's content may not indicate the current state of the law. Nothing on this site is meant to predict or guarantee future results. I am not liable for the use or interpretation of information contained on this website, and expressly disclaim all liability for any actions you take or fail to take, based on this website's content.

Links

I do not necessarily endorse and am not responsible for content accessed through this website's links to other Internet resources. Correctness and adequacy of information on those sites is not guaranteed, and unless otherwise stated, I am not associated with such linked sites.

Contacting Me

You may email me through the email address provided by this site, but information you send through email or this website is not secure and may not be confidential. Communications will not be treated as privileged unless I already represent you. Do not send confidential information until you have established a formal attorney-client relationship with me. Even if I represent you, please understand that email security is still uncertain and that you accept all risks of such uncertainty and potential lack of confidentiality when you send us unencrypted, sensitive, or confidential email. Email from me never constitutes an electronic signature, unless it expressly says so.