Legal Meets Practical: Accessible Solutions

The GAO: Where Recommendations Actually Mean Something

The one disadvantage to protesting agency contract action at the Government Accountability Office (GAO) is that GAO decisions aren’t binding or mandatory – they’re effectively advisory. A contracting agency doesn’t have to follow them (although if it does not, it must explain why). But based on the GAO’s annual report released to Congress on November 18, 2014, it’s clear that this “disadvantage” doesn’t really exist, as in Fiscal Year 2013, every single contracting agency facing a sustained GAO protest elected to implement the GAO’s recommendation, with only one exception.

In case you’re curious, this one case involved the Air Force’s effort to implement its Food Transformation Initiative without following applicable competitive procedures. The protestor successfully argued that the Air Force had improperly invoked the public interest exception under 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(7), which led to the unreasonable justification of using a Memorandum of Agreement to implement the Food Transformation Initiative. Asiel Enterprises, Inc., B-408315.2, (September 5, 2013).

The GAO’s annual report also addressed the government shutdown’s effect on protest resolutions. As noted, during this time, the GAO extended bid protest deadlines by one day for each day the GAO was shut down. When the federal government shut down on October 1, there were 280 active bid protest cases in progress. Because the government shutdown lasted for 16 days, the bid protest deadlines were extended for a maximum of 16 days.

Last, the annual report gave us the skinny on statistics: how many protests before the GAO were successful? According to the annual report, of the 556 protests decided on the merits (i.e., not denied for timeliness or procedural issues), only 13% (72 protests) were sustained. However, we should keep in mind that these figures don’t account for the instances where an agency took corrective action on its own initiative following a GAO protest, resulting in the protest being dismissed as moot. This means the success rate isn’t truly 13%; according to a chart on page seven of the report, 43% of all protestors received some form of relief from the agency (such as voluntary corrective action). Not too shabby.

Access the GAO’s report here.

*Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for Sarah Schauerte’s legal blog on timely veterans issues at https://legalmeetspractical.com.

 

 

Comments are closed.

Mission Statement

My mission is to provide accessible, high-quality legal services to small business owners and to veterans. I will strive to clearly communicate, understand objectives, and formulate and execute effective legal solutions.

Disclaimer

No Attorney-Client Relationship

This website is maintained exclusively for informational purposes. It is not intended to provide legal or other professional advice and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the lawyer or her clients. Viewing this site, using information from it, or communicating with Sarah Schauerte through this site by email does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Non-Reliance

Online readers should not act nor decline to act, based on content from this site, without first consulting an attorney or other appropriate professional. Because the law changes frequently, this website's content may not indicate the current state of the law. Nothing on this site is meant to predict or guarantee future results. I am not liable for the use or interpretation of information contained on this website, and expressly disclaim all liability for any actions you take or fail to take, based on this website's content.

Links

I do not necessarily endorse and am not responsible for content accessed through this website's links to other Internet resources. Correctness and adequacy of information on those sites is not guaranteed, and unless otherwise stated, I am not associated with such linked sites.

Contacting Me

You may email me through the email address provided by this site, but information you send through email or this website is not secure and may not be confidential. Communications will not be treated as privileged unless I already represent you. Do not send confidential information until you have established a formal attorney-client relationship with me. Even if I represent you, please understand that email security is still uncertain and that you accept all risks of such uncertainty and potential lack of confidentiality when you send us unencrypted, sensitive, or confidential email. Email from me never constitutes an electronic signature, unless it expressly says so.