Legal Meets Practical: Accessible Solutions

Justice at Last: Guilty Verdicts in SDVOSB Fraud Scheme

Following a 13-day trial, in December of 2015 a jury convicted two individuals – Ricky Anthony Lanier, and his wife Katrina Reshina Lanier, 43 –  both of LaGrange, N.C., of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and major fraud against the United States.

Sentencing is set for June 2016, in U.S. District Court. Ricky Lanier faces a possible sentence of up to 60 years in prison and $1 million in fines; while Katrina Lanier faces a possible sentence of up to 50 years in prison and $750,000 in fines. The Laniers agreed to forfeit their interests in approximately $170,000 in funds seized from bank accounts as well as five houses purchased with proceeds of the fraud.

According to the evidence presented at trial, the Laniers conspired from November 2005 to April 2013 to defraud the United States government through a scheme to fraudulently obtain federal contracts intended to be awarded to businesses lawfully participating in the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) program and the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 8(a) Business Development program.

Ricky Lanier, who had previously owned and operated an 8(a) business receiving government contracts, became ineligible to participate in the 8(a) program after that business graduated from the 8(a) program in 2008. Lanier used a friend and service-disabled veteran as the purported owner of Kylee Construction, representing that the friend was involved in the daily management of the business, even while the friend was working for a government contractor in Afghanistan.

Also, the Laniers used a business owned by Ricky Lanier’s college roommate, JMR Investments, as a front to obtain construction contracts from the National Park Service and other federal agencies under the 8(a) program, misrepresenting the friend’s involvement in the management and operation of the business. The scheme involved sub-contracting out all or almost all of the work on the contracts in violation of program requirements.

As a result of the false representations, Kylee Construction was awarded over $5 million in government contracts and JMR Investments was awarded over $9 million in government contracts, to include contracts for construction at the VA Medical Center at Mountain Home, Tenn., and in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The Laniers received almost $2 million in financial benefit from the scheme, using accounts of the shell companies for payment of personal expenses.

Nancy Harr, Acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee said, “The integrity of the Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business program is vital to its continued success. The U.S. Attorney’s Office will aggressively pursue and prosecute those who attempt to defraud that federal program and therefore the United States.”

How sad! Imagine how many tax dollars were spent pursuing prosecution, as well as how many years spent by the relevant investigating bodies. And think of this – while this is framed as an example of justice, many fraudulent companies slip through the cracks. It’s generally only when a contracting officer smells something rotten that a company falls under scrutiny; after all, a call to the VA’s Office of Inspector General hotline alleging procurement fraud does not often result in criminal prosecution.

*Did you find this article informative? If so, sign up for Sarah Schauerte’s blog on veterans issues at: https://legalmeetspractical.com. Remember to click the link to activate your subscription!

Also, to my faithful readers, I do apologize that I missed a week of blogging! I’m also a professional writer, and I needed the time last week to complete edits to my debut novel and create my website. I’ll catch up on other January items next week.

One Response to “Justice at Last: Guilty Verdicts in SDVOSB Fraud Scheme”

  1. I’m glad that they were finally given their due in court! 🙂

Mission Statement

My mission is to provide accessible, high-quality legal services to small business owners and to veterans. I will strive to clearly communicate, understand objectives, and formulate and execute effective legal solutions.

Disclaimer

No Attorney-Client Relationship

This website is maintained exclusively for informational purposes. It is not intended to provide legal or other professional advice and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the lawyer or her clients. Viewing this site, using information from it, or communicating with Sarah Schauerte through this site by email does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Non-Reliance

Online readers should not act nor decline to act, based on content from this site, without first consulting an attorney or other appropriate professional. Because the law changes frequently, this website's content may not indicate the current state of the law. Nothing on this site is meant to predict or guarantee future results. I am not liable for the use or interpretation of information contained on this website, and expressly disclaim all liability for any actions you take or fail to take, based on this website's content.

Links

I do not necessarily endorse and am not responsible for content accessed through this website's links to other Internet resources. Correctness and adequacy of information on those sites is not guaranteed, and unless otherwise stated, I am not associated with such linked sites.

Contacting Me

You may email me through the email address provided by this site, but information you send through email or this website is not secure and may not be confidential. Communications will not be treated as privileged unless I already represent you. Do not send confidential information until you have established a formal attorney-client relationship with me. Even if I represent you, please understand that email security is still uncertain and that you accept all risks of such uncertainty and potential lack of confidentiality when you send us unencrypted, sensitive, or confidential email. Email from me never constitutes an electronic signature, unless it expressly says so.